
Arranging Love
Matchmakers. Exchanging pictures. And email addresses. Finding out about their family background. And religion. And social status. Whether their parents were divorced, had a love marriage, or were arranged. What do their siblings do? The list goes on and on. And somewhere between the ‘a’ of age and ‘z’ of zealous parents on that list, I begin to feel like the ‘c’ for cow being sold at an auction. Or horse. Or mare, as the case may be. In ‘Black Beauty’ they talk of auctions, horse auctions, where the prospective buyer looks the horse up and down, enquires about its breed and heritage, examines its coat for scars, its knees for marks of a jumper, or its back and strength to carry goods up a hill. And I couldn’t help but be struck by the similarity in an arranged marriage.True, you get a fine horse.. well trained, obedient, willing… and completely devoid of spirit. But then again, that was what all that training was for, wasn’t it? Fixing the saddle, and the bit, the training ring and whip – all to quench whatever vestige of ’spirit’ there may have been. Create, without a laboratory, or test- tubes, and all after birth at that, a hybrid. Are hybrids always better than the original? How many more errors are there always than that one working prototype? Has nature not always given rise to more working prototypes than man’s feeble attempts at playing God? And what more sublime a nature, than that quality of human nature, the one we call love?
“It works out so well for the majority” one might argue. And yes, who can argue that? India has 1/6th of the world’s population, with a majority of arranged marriages and divorce rates well under 30%… while the West, with a predominance of allegedly ‘love’ marriages, has a divorce rate over 51%, tilting the viewers scale to the favour of arranged marriage, given the statistics. And how can you contradict statistics, the critics condemn. But Biostatistics, would beg to differ. Would you, would you care to pause for just one moment… and reflect on what the statistics really are?
If divorce is your benchmark, then there are only 2 options – divorce, or no divorce. Leaving you with a 50-50 margin of chance. Equal opportunity, you could say. Different strokes for different folks. And again, how many of those marriages ending up in divorce were really ‘love’ marriages.. and not ‘lust’ marriages.
And then I get rebuked… “Love? What is love? Soon as that ring is on your finger – or around your neck, as is more appropriate, love goes out the window. 10 years down the line, love or no love, its all the same.” Well… love is what makes that ring worthwhile, what makes it more than the metal is worth, what scientists cannot explain to the day, but lovers already know by instinct alone.
That those in love declare that they cannot live apart, or die, is fallacy, for survival alone needs no love – but without it, to live, is a dead existence.
The ‘arranged’ wife will pray for her husband to live, so he can support her and her children. But the ‘love’ wife will pray for her companion.
The arranged husband will yell when his dinner isn’t ready at exactly 9pm and his wife will sulk… the ‘love’ husband will yell, but it only serves to make the kiss and make up session so much more intense.
The arranged parents will teach their kids to follow, rigorously, tradition, go off to college and get a degree, get married to continue your family line, think well and mindfully before they select the breeding ground to ensure the genetic carry-forward and hybrid DNA. The ‘love’ parents will teach their kids about life, and values behind the tradition, will send their kids off to college but know they will come back; their children learn to follow their hearts, and their DNA is concocted with the all-knowing secret ingredient of the subconscious, that knows better than its conscious rival, the ingredient of love.
The ‘arranged’ kids obey as they know no other way, out of tradition and fear of insubordinance, their driving force being fear. The ‘love’ kids obey out of respect, awe and love, their driving force being their conscience.
For the intangible to become tangible, you must bear the sensory organ to bear witness to it; and this, marks the difference between those that know, and those that do not. And while all do not, only some, it is true, possess the ability; it is possible, with time, to consciously remove it, as in enucleation of an eyeball. But the memory, if it ever existed, will remain. As the brain saves its visual centre, even though it may atrophy, and the memory of images may dull with time, there will always be a trace of it, no matter how inaccessible, in the far reaches of the subconscious that saves all; it will remain, to haunt, like a spectre, when least aware.
And at those rare and far-between moments when that love is brought to surface, by a long ago memory, a distant reminder, and a small smile, barely perceptible, quivers just the corner of your lips, not reaching, yet a smile, nor also a pout, then, you know.. you always knew, what love is.
Filed under: love | Tagged: arranged, beauty, black, cow, debate, horse, hybrid, India, love, lust, Marriage, nature, review, statistics, West | Leave a Comment »


